An unprecedented lawsuit has been filed in the economic section of the Tel Aviv District Court docket in opposition to Israeli unicorn Lusha, which 6 months ago, raised $205 million at a valuation of $1.5 billion. The lawsuit, submitted by Plus Ventures venture money fund and Oren Abekasis, are suing Lusha and business people Assaf Eisenstein, his wife Anat Eisenstein, and Yoni Tserruya. In the match, Furthermore Ventures and Abekasis are demanding legal rights to a 35% of the company’s shares.

The match was submitted by Advs. Zohar Lande, Eyal Nachshon, Dana Bookstein, and Naama Ben Aroush Moshe of Barnea Jaffa Lande & Co. regulation organization. In accordance to the suit, the Eisensteins and Tserruya fraudulently and at the rear of the backs of the plaintiffs, undertook a approach intended to dispossess the fruits of the plaintiffs’ investment and shares, deliver them with bogus shows, and to steal from them the promising and lucrative enterprise and solution in which they invested including their rights and to acquire the venture and product or service, to trade them and gain from the profits.

The fit states that the plaintiffs invested thousands and thousands of shekels in the Neta Eisenstein corporation and cumulatively held 35% of its shares and rights. The plaintiffs did such out of faith in the company’s products, in its eyesight, and in its lead entrepreneur, Assaf Eisenstein. Throughout this time period, the enterprise centered, among other matters, on progress of the solution known as Community Monkey, a web browser increase-on, which as a result of monitoring and info from net platforms, helps consumers in determining target populations appropriate to their needs.

In practice, in its most current variety, from March 2016, the products has been generally built to serve as an world wide web browser increase-on, which enables people, checking out the LinkedIn internet site, to identify suitable targets and get their personal particulars. The lawsuit states that in the 4 years prior to the starting of 2016, the plaintiffs supported the organization in typical and Assaf Eisenstein in particular, and labored with him in get to fulfill, develop, apply, and advertise the firm’s vision and dynamic targets, as very well as the impressive and promising enterprise and item that it promoted.

About the a long time, the plaintiffs invested their dollars in the undertaking, in accordance to the calls for of Assaf Eisenstein who was the entrepreneur, director, CEO and spirit at the rear of the enterprise, although they relied on his displays and set their full have confidence in in him. In addition to their funds, the plaintiffs invested their time and encounter in the organization and recommended Assaf Eisenstein.




Related Article content




Israeli B2B intelligence co Lusha raises $205m







“Only in hindsight did it develop into very clear to the plaintiffs, to their astonishment, that they continued to invest their funds and commit assets to the corporation in response to Assaf Eisenstein’s requests, whilst he worked in the darkish and powering their backs, along with his wife, in get to dispossess, oust and exclude the plaintiffs, and steal the undertaking and product or service in whole from the plaintiffs, and the relaxation of the firm’s traders

“The plaintiffs also uncovered that at some issue, Assaf linked with Yoni Tserruya with the target of ousting and stealing the entire venture and item from the plaintiffs and other business traders. It is also claimed that it became very clear to the plaintiffs subsequently that in the beginning of 2016, at the same time that Assaf engaged in false illustration to the plaintiffs, declaring the task experienced been finished and had occur as far as it could, Assaf linked to Yoni Tzeruya, and jointly, they set out on a joint venture, with the challenge and its solution at its middle.” The two secretly founded a new company, although hiding their id as shareholders, and they transferred the products to this new corporate framework.

It is also claimed that, “Assaf and Yoni utilised the venture’s first company program they stole the company’s business strategies as nicely as its engineering, which include the unique code of its flagship solution the two made use of the company’s vital men and women, who secretly moved to employment at the ‘new venture’ and the two labored in direction of the exact same targets, tips, consumers, consumers, strategic designs, and advancement prospects made at the company they even made use of the plaintiffs’ income, which was presented at the starting to fund the company’s tasks and merchandise.”

The lawsuit promises that the code was made for an identical function and is centered on an similar code, which underwent blurring and camouflaging. The plaintiffs declare that they did not know of this activity. The match adds that Assaf commenced, as yet another line of fake representation and inappropriate functions, with each other with his wife, who even served as a director of the company, to check out and force for dismantling and liquidation of the Neta Eisenstein corporation, when hiding substantial information from the plaintiffs.

The go well with claims that on March 18, 2016, the Eisenstein organization offered the last edition of the item, Network Monkey, which was added to the Google Chrome app keep. It was subsequently discovered that on that precise working day, an similar edition of the application, termed Lusha, was also included to the application shop. That item, as the plaintiffs have figured out lately, was duplicated by Assaf Eisenstein and the progress and marketing and advertising groups at the Neta Eisenstein firm. This was completed by a top secret and independent company framework, and know-how of its existence was never ever shared with the plaintiffs and was held from them.

According to claims made by the enterprise capital fund, as a consequence of an investigation, they uncovered that from the commencing of 2016, Assaf Eisenstein started to “enjoy a double activity”, in which on the one hand, he functioned in his numerous roles at the Neta Eisenstein corporation and introduced to the plaintiffs bogus presentations, professing that the enterprise was reaching the conclude of its functions and was to be liquidated although on the other hand, Assaf Eisenstein was functioning in the shadows with his spouse to transfer the undertaking into the new corporate framework, which he proven with Yoni Tzeruya. According to the lawsuit, Eisenstein and Tzeruya had been aware of the seriousness of their steps and hence blurred their identities as homeowners of the duplicated app, performing for an prolonged period “below the radar.” Hence, as portion of the conspiracy that Eisenstein and Tzeruya place jointly, on May well 22, 2016, Assaf Eisenstein founded the Lusha Devices Ltd.

Through an additional camouflage course of action, the company’s shares ended up not held instantly and in the name of the two “business people.” Instead, they ended up held in trust, by Y.D.H. Trusts, Ltd. Subsequently, it grew to become recognised to the plaintiffs that the company’s shares have been held and similarly divided (50-50) by Assaf Eisenstein and Yoni Tzeruya. The company then merged with another corporation with the identify DEV YT LTD., which was owned by Tzeruya.

The lawsuit is also based mostly on an skilled feeling, which determines that the essence of the performance, the user interface, and the consumer facet code of every of the two apps are comparable to entirely equivalent and that “there is no likelihood of acquiring this level of similarity, if the new application was made from scratch… there is no doubt that this is a hurried copy/paste of the original software package undertaking.” As if this is not plenty of, the pro, Dude Ronen, claims that in aspects where the two applications current minimal differences in software package, this is an effort and hard work to “camouflage,” the duplication initiatives, as a result of the addition of the Lusha branding in the opening/closing of the app, has no sensible justification.

The lawsuit, as said, suggests that the undertaking funds fund found out that it experienced been a victim of fraud only thanks to articles or blog posts in “Globes”, which featured Lusha and interviewed its CEO Assaf Eisenstein, in December 2021. The plaintiffs located an post in “Globes” entitled, “We obtained a lot of email messages from funds, and we explained no thanks: the startup that does not want investors.” The plaintiffs were astonished to learn that the posting features an job interview with Assaf Eisenstein, who explains his doctrine with regard to associations amongst business owners and buyers. He is presented in the article as the particular person heading Lusha, and as ‘someone who experienced managed without the need of external funding till six months beforehand.’

No comment has however been obtained from Lusha.

Posted by Globes, Israel enterprise information – en.globes.co.il – on May well 8, 2022.

© Copyright of Globes Publisher Itonut (1983) Ltd., 2022.


More Stories
Cut-price shares for sale in Israeli unicorns
Evelabs raises $200,000 from angel, individual investors
How AirSlate Raised a $51.5 Million Series C Round Led by G Squared